For Nonprofits & Public Agencies

Bring senior craft to a problem you actually have.

Host a small team of senior game-industry practitioners for a 12-month engagement on a real project. We pay them. We support them. You scope the problem, give them access to the people who matter, and ship something with them at the end.

Problems we’re built for

Six patterns where game craft adds the most value.

We’re not a software vendor. We’re a fellowship. The problems where we add the most value need engagement, behavior change, learning, or radical accessibility — and a clear public-interest case.

Pattern 01

Engagement that PDFs can’t solve

Public-health screening, civic education, beneficiary outreach — something important to communicate, and current channels aren’t landing.

Pattern 02

Service flows with high drop-off

Benefits enrollment, court navigation, eligibility screening — people who should be making it through your funnel aren’t.

Pattern 03

Training that has to stick

Workforce certification, clinical decision-making, harm reduction — classroom or video isn’t producing the behavior change you need.

Pattern 04

Decisions that need a model

Climate, land use, public-health policy — you need a simulation that lets people feel tradeoffs they otherwise wouldn’t.

Pattern 05

Accessibility-first redesign

An existing tool that needs to genuinely serve people with disabilities, low literacy, or limited English — not minimum-compliance retrofits.

Pattern 06

Something else entirely

If you have a public-interest problem and a hunch that game craft might help, talk to us. Worst case we’ll say “not this cohort.”

How it works

From first conversation to working product.

Stage 01

Intake conversation

~60 minutes with our Partnerships Director. We learn about your problem, audience, and constraints. We tell you whether we think it’s a fit and what would need to be true for us to move forward.

Stage 02

Scoping memo

If we both want to move forward, we co-author a Scoping Memo: the problem statement, audience, mission alignment, deliverables, evaluation approach, and host responsibilities.

Stage 03

MOU and pre-flight

Host MOU governing IP, confidentiality, accessibility, evaluation, and termination rights. You set up system access, identify the Primary Point of Contact, and handle any background checks.

Stage 04

Discovery & design

Months 1–5. The fellow team embeds with you, talks to end-users, and produces working prototypes. Weekly check-in, milestone reviews. We support with curriculum and mentorship.

Stage 05

Build & pilot

Months 6–10. Build the product to a quality your operations can support, pilot with real users, iterate on findings. You’re a co-owner of the work, not a client.

Stage 06

Handoff & evaluation

Months 11–12. Handoff documentation, published evaluation, open-source releases. Your team owns ongoing operations; we stay in touch as alumni.

The deal

Who does what.

No surprises. A clear split of responsibilities, lifted directly from our standard Host MOU. We tailor specifics to each engagement, but these baselines hold.

What we do

  • + Recruit, select, train, and place the fellow team
  • + Pay all stipends, taxes, benefits, and travel
  • + Provide curriculum, mentorship, and access to Organization tools
  • + Designate a Program Director as your single point of contact
  • + Manage fellow performance and address concerns you raise
  • + Provide an evaluation framework appropriate to the project
  • + Honor your IP and confidentiality terms in writing

What you do

  • + Designate an Executive Sponsor at the senior-leadership level
  • + Designate a Primary Point of Contact, ~80% available, weekly check-ins
  • + Provide subject-matter experts at a reasonable cadence
  • + Provide workspace (if needed), system access, data access, and tools within five business days
  • + Facilitate access to end-users for research, on terms appropriate to your population
  • + Comply with our Safeguarding Policy where work involves minors or vulnerable persons
  • + Give us candid, timely feedback on the team’s performance
Cost share

What it costs you.

Each fellow-year costs us about $123,000 all-in — stipend, benefits, training, evaluation, program support. We don’t expect hosts to cover that. But we do ask for a contribution proportionate to your size, because skin in the game produces better outcomes for everyone.

The default model below is a starting point. We waive or reduce it where the public-interest case is strong and resources are constrained.

Federal & state agencies

Standard contract or contribution

Priced through standard procurement at a level that covers fellow team cost plus a modest program contribution. Most federal/state hosts use existing technical-assistance authorities.

Large nonprofits ($25M+ budget)

$150K–$250K cash or grant

A typical contribution covers roughly the direct fellow team cost. Often funded through a designated grant from a foundation aligned with your mission.

Mid-size nonprofits ($5M–$25M)

$50K–$150K cash, in-kind welcome

Reduced cash contribution offset by significant in-kind: senior staff time, end-user access, evaluation infrastructure, or co-funding from a third-party funder.

Small nonprofits & local agencies

In-kind only or waived

Where the work is high-impact and resources are limited, we cover the fellow team cost from our own funder pool. Strong scope, strong sponsorship, and demonstrable end-user access matter most.

Start a conversation

Tell us about your problem.

A real human reads every submission. We respond within five business days.

Up to 2,000 characters.

Prefer email? hosts@gameforamerica.org reaches the same team.

Common host questions.

Anything else? Email hosts@gameforamerica.org — happy to talk before you submit anything formal.

Are we contracting with you, or is this something else?

It’s a fellowship engagement, governed by a Memorandum of Understanding rather than a procurement contract. The fellows are our employees, not yours. Where federal or state procurement rules require a contract instrument, we can structure as a cooperative agreement or technical-assistance vehicle.

Who owns the work product?

Default is joint ownership, with each side holding the licenses needed for ongoing use. Reusable, generalizable components default to permissive open-source licenses so others can replicate. Where you require exclusive rights, we accommodate in the MOU and retain rights to publish anonymized learnings.

What about our data privacy and security requirements?

Standard. We sign a Data Protection Addendum before any personal data moves between us, with breach notification, sub-processor controls, and security measures appropriate to your sector. We have templates aligned to common federal and state requirements (HIPAA, FERPA, CJIS, COPPA).

Can the project involve minors or other vulnerable populations?

Yes, and we treat that work seriously. Our Safeguarding Policy governs how fellows engage — informed consent, training, chaperoning, age-appropriate design, mandated-reporter compliance. Background checks are completed before placement when required.

What if we’re not sure our project counts as a “game”?

Most don’t. Our scope is broader than entertainment games — simulators, decision-support tools, learning experiences, accessible service flows, gameful interactions inside otherwise plain interfaces. If your problem benefits from systems thinking, motivation design, or interactive learning, the “is it a game?” question is the wrong one to ask first.

What if the engagement doesn’t work out partway through?

Either side can terminate for material breach with 30 days’ notice and an opportunity to cure. We also have explicit pause and termination rights if a project drifts toward subject matter outside our scope. We’d rather have an honest off-ramp than push through a bad fit.

What kind of evaluation do you build in?

It depends on the project. For behavior-change or learning interventions, pre/post measurement with appropriate comparison; for service redesigns, drop-off and accessibility metrics; for decision tools, qualitative feedback from real users. We work with your team and any academic partners to land on something meaningful and feasible.

Will you publish about our work?

Generally yes — with your sign-off. Publication of generalized findings and case studies is part of how we build the field. We never publish without your review, and we never disclose sensitive information about your operations or end-users.

Not ready to host?

Plenty of other paths. Forward to a colleague, apply as a fellow, or become a Partner Studio.

Apply as a fellow Become a partner studio Donate